Because Of The Failure Of Logical Thinking
Selasa, 10 Desember 2013
0
komentar
From the title, you're wondering what the heck? that will be examined from the title above? Here I would be a little expose to exist that we as humans in everyday life often fail in logical thinking, well ... because that's what I'll describe here according to what I know and understand the cause of the failure of logical thinking.
okey entered the first stage, here we need to know first what is logical thinking? You know? (answer in the liver only) if thought surely you already know because that you do every day, but it is logical according to the dictionary of Psychology j. p. Chaplin (2009) have the sense of logic is concerned, characterized by a healthy and correct reasoning. So it can be concluded that logical thinking is an activity that is concerned with the cognitive logic or can be connected with a healthy and correct reasoning. Now getting a little brighter on the sense of Logical Thinking now we can go to find out what being a failed logical thinking.
Because of the failure to think logically according to r. Solso L et al (2008) there are six (6) anything huh? Among others: the fruit of false thoughts of reifikasi (an abstract is considered to be real), Ad Hominem Argument, the argument that use of coercion and force, using power and fame, the majority's argument, the argument must be true Man of straw. Well definitely confused right? What are the purpose and explanation let's see ...
The fruit of false thoughts of Reifikasi, which is the FRUIT here is not the fruit that we eat everyday, but especially to the fruit that is a result of our thinking are fallible, sometimes even we interpret an abstract is considered real or real existence (Reifikasi). Well here is an example of someone as Indonesia feels the people losers or harmed by the Law Institute, said, "this Law unfair to me!" he considers that the Legal Act as Individuals when in fact no such Legal Institution. May a judge in the condemning Agency pursuant to section applicable and reasonable.
Ad Hominem arguments, what is it? This is related to the argument that strikes one's character and not the content of his argument. For example, in the realm of politics such as the HOUSE of REPRESENTATIVES are currently meeting, there was a politician who presented ideas make sense but it didebat with other politicians, not because the idea but is her moral character.
Next. third, the argument that use of coercion and force, it's an argument that leveled using the power to authorize an argument "AS the support Viet Nam during the war because they are a strong nation and immoral". The strength and the moral here is great but if it has nothing to do with the Treaty and the rights of a nation's sovereignty is not logical.
Using the power and fame, it is a logical error which made people in power and or famous people who make statements about others, well maybe you often come across it on tv, usually people in power like the Government or big political figures or as famous as the artists who often spreading its sensation. The example here is often the ads on tv featuring the artist or athlete who advertise products that we actually don't know, well that's included in the failure of logical thinking.
Then next, Arguments the majority must be right, this is too sensitive dimasyarakat Indonesia in particular, sometimes people follow an argument which is not necessarily the truth of this argument, however, believed the majority of people. This happens if a lot of people doing something, it must be true. For example, when there is a prohibition against the current to pass one way but due to the many people who are against the current cursor path we manganggapnya right and we also follow suit.
The last straw Man Argument is, it's not the same with straw hat in the film "ONE PIECE" yet prior to this a weak argument membagun and connect it with others so that they can defeat him. For example, a young child is asked by his mother "can be value berpa Deuteronomy today kiddo?" but the child answered "Last friends value me be repeat 3 and I'm still a bit above that 4" might be this thing we often do.
Of all the explanations above, is the cause of the failure in the analysis of the logical or berfikri logical, well now already know it, so don't repeat again huh? Thank You.
Ref:
R. Solso L, et al.(2008). psikologi kognitif. Jakarta: Erlangga
Kartono, Kartini, (2009) kamus lengkap psikologi j. p. Chaplin. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada
Categories:
(12410078) Aliffiadi FF
0 komentar:
Posting Komentar