Subhanallah, Our Perceptions Is Same!!!
Sabtu, 19 Oktober 2013
0
komentar
I want to tell you a little story about
my experience that day were amazing. This week was my group's turn for a
presentation in class. The presentation about of Cognitive Psychology
courses.
The course is held on Thursday October 3, 2013, at 07.00 pm, was held at
the B
R.212 (UIN Maliki Malang).
When the presentation, we provide simulations of the material that we say. At the beginning of the presentation, we give the simulation by asking the audience as props. One time, one of our current simulations give three audience asked to draw a house freely. Then was asked to draw the results collected. So, what happened? Results draw audiences alike! Drawing audiences home with the same perspective, using perspective drawing looks ahead. Not a side, middle, edge, down, up, or oblique.
When asked why the audience seemed to draw a house with a front perspective? Audience responded that comes to mind when it was drawing is a form of home front and they think the home form is the most convenient form. How can the perception of the same audience? That question will be answered by the theory of object recognition by canonical perspective. In everyday life there are thousands of stimuli that we caught, but not all the stimuli we give more attention so that we are able to recognize what object has given stimuli on us. In the process of the introduction of an object, there is an alternative that is most often used by humans. Much as the audience in the upper third, the use of alternative canonical perspective. Canonical perspective (canonic perspective) is the best point of view to represent (describe) an object, or an image (image) that first come to mind when you are given a form (Solso, 2007).
The theory is similar to what is
experienced by the audience that they draw match what first comes to
mind when
terstimulus and making the most easily recognizable form. Why is this
so?
Because that first appears is the result of our previous knowledge of
the
storage objects, develop a permanent memory of the most representative
appearances and performances that give the most information. Easy, first
thing
comes to our mind is a common thing we know.
Does not rule out the possibility
that each person has a different perception or perspective in their mind
to
describe something. However, to explain the lack of a canonical image
requires
a longer reaction time. It is caused by several factors, namely:
a. There are fewer parts of the object can be identified.
b. Best display (canonical) is prevalent view that we see.
c. Canonical view is a display of the most ideal.
Well! After being briefed on how
perception can be just a few individuals to an object, then we know that
humans
in general using canonical alternative perspectives in the process of
object
recognition. Therefore, this perspective is more easy to do and a short
time
due to susceptible (something that first comes to mind) showed that the
reflex
in practice. That is the uniqueness and advantages than the canonical
perspective. Just a suggestion to all my friends, we better illustrate
something through a canonical perspective, because denagan amount of
information
that we can further allows us to recognize objects and interpret them.
Subhanallah! that's how science explains how each individual have the
same perception
of an object.
After exposure to the perspective
ended, a group of us went back presentations on object processing.
Actually
canonical perspective is not the only way in Mengnali objects, but many
other
alternatives that can help us in recognizing objects. Among these are,
visual
pattern recognition, Gestalt Theory, Processing Buttom-Up and Top-Down,
template matching, feature analysis and prototype matching.
That explanation of how human beings
have the same perspective through a canonical perspective. May be
useful.
Sources: Solso, Robert L et al,
(2007), Cognitive Psychology, New York: McGraw
Alpha
Categories:
(12410148) Safinah Al Mubarokah
0 komentar:
Posting Komentar