Narture VS Nurture
Selasa, 26 November 2013
0
komentar
Anyone
know about Chomsky and Skinner 's theory of language ?
They
both have different viewpoints about the language .
If
Chomsky assumes that language is innate ( nature) , then Skinner argued that
language is acquired through learning ( nurture ) .
Chomsky
expressed the opinion that the only aspect of language development is obtained
through reinforcement morphological aspects . What is a morphological aspect ?
, Morphology ( morphology ) is the study of the structure of words . So Chomsky
emphasized that language is acquired through the strengthening of its word
structure .
For
example , when children are learning to say a thing . The child will get
reinforcement in the form of consent from their parents . Certain words is
obtained through reinforcement , but when words are combined to form sentences
, the sentences are controlled by rules that are universal .
Chomsky
also states that reinforcement alone is not enough to explain how a child is
able to produce a sentence while the boy had never heard that phrase before.
According to Chomsky there is an innate tendency towards language based on the
deep structure as a plausible explanation .
Chomsky's
theory does not state that a specific system of grammar is hardwired , he
stated that we have an innate schema that serves as a means of processing
information and the formation of abstract structures in our language .
Categories:
(12410048) Ghina Elzanadia Nisrina
0 komentar:
Posting Komentar